Škrbić, Biljana

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
69b1fcb7-3fa7-4959-b924-80af1a3e8343
  • Škrbić, Biljana (3)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods

Héberger, Karoly; Sakan, Sanja M.; Škrbić, Biljana; Popović, Aleksandar R.; Đorđević, Dragana S.; Relić, Dubravka

(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Héberger, Karoly
AU  - Sakan, Sanja M.
AU  - Škrbić, Biljana
AU  - Popović, Aleksandar R.
AU  - Đorđević, Dragana S.
AU  - Relić, Dubravka
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3250
AB  - This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniques and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Chemosphere
T1  - Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods
VL  - 198
SP  - 103
EP  - 110
DO  - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Héberger, Karoly and Sakan, Sanja M. and Škrbić, Biljana and Popović, Aleksandar R. and Đorđević, Dragana S. and Relić, Dubravka",
year = "2018",
abstract = "This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniques and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Chemosphere",
title = "Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods",
volume = "198",
pages = "103-110",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200"
}
Héberger, K., Sakan, S. M., Škrbić, B., Popović, A. R., Đorđević, D. S.,& Relić, D.. (2018). Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods. in Chemosphere
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 198, 103-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200
Héberger K, Sakan SM, Škrbić B, Popović AR, Đorđević DS, Relić D. Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods. in Chemosphere. 2018;198:103-110.
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200 .
Héberger, Karoly, Sakan, Sanja M., Škrbić, Biljana, Popović, Aleksandar R., Đorđević, Dragana S., Relić, Dubravka, "Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods" in Chemosphere, 198 (2018):103-110,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200 . .
7
3
6
5

Supplementary material for the article: Relić, D.; Héberger, K.; Sakan, S.; Škrbić, B.; Popović, A.; Đorđević, D. Ranking and Similarity of Conventional, Microwave and Ultrasound Element Sequential Extraction Methods. Chemosphere 2018, 198, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200

Héberger, Karoly; Sakan, Sanja M.; Škrbić, Biljana; Popović, Aleksandar R.; Đorđević, Dragana S.; Relić, Dubravka

(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2018)

TY  - DATA
AU  - Héberger, Karoly
AU  - Sakan, Sanja M.
AU  - Škrbić, Biljana
AU  - Popović, Aleksandar R.
AU  - Đorđević, Dragana S.
AU  - Relić, Dubravka
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3251
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Chemosphere
T1  - Supplementary material for the article: Relić, D.; Héberger, K.; Sakan, S.; Škrbić, B.; Popović, A.; Đorđević, D. Ranking and Similarity of Conventional, Microwave and Ultrasound Element Sequential Extraction Methods. Chemosphere 2018, 198, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3251
ER  - 
@misc{
author = "Héberger, Karoly and Sakan, Sanja M. and Škrbić, Biljana and Popović, Aleksandar R. and Đorđević, Dragana S. and Relić, Dubravka",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Chemosphere",
title = "Supplementary material for the article: Relić, D.; Héberger, K.; Sakan, S.; Škrbić, B.; Popović, A.; Đorđević, D. Ranking and Similarity of Conventional, Microwave and Ultrasound Element Sequential Extraction Methods. Chemosphere 2018, 198, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3251"
}
Héberger, K., Sakan, S. M., Škrbić, B., Popović, A. R., Đorđević, D. S.,& Relić, D.. (2018). Supplementary material for the article: Relić, D.; Héberger, K.; Sakan, S.; Škrbić, B.; Popović, A.; Đorđević, D. Ranking and Similarity of Conventional, Microwave and Ultrasound Element Sequential Extraction Methods. Chemosphere 2018, 198, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200. in Chemosphere
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3251
Héberger K, Sakan SM, Škrbić B, Popović AR, Đorđević DS, Relić D. Supplementary material for the article: Relić, D.; Héberger, K.; Sakan, S.; Škrbić, B.; Popović, A.; Đorđević, D. Ranking and Similarity of Conventional, Microwave and Ultrasound Element Sequential Extraction Methods. Chemosphere 2018, 198, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200. in Chemosphere. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3251 .
Héberger, Karoly, Sakan, Sanja M., Škrbić, Biljana, Popović, Aleksandar R., Đorđević, Dragana S., Relić, Dubravka, "Supplementary material for the article: Relić, D.; Héberger, K.; Sakan, S.; Škrbić, B.; Popović, A.; Đorđević, D. Ranking and Similarity of Conventional, Microwave and Ultrasound Element Sequential Extraction Methods. Chemosphere 2018, 198, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200" in Chemosphere (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3251 .

Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods

Relić, Dubravka; Héberger, Karoly; Sakan, Sanja M.; Škrbić, Biljana; Popović, Aleksandar R.; Đorđević, Dragana S.

(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Relić, Dubravka
AU  - Héberger, Karoly
AU  - Sakan, Sanja M.
AU  - Škrbić, Biljana
AU  - Popović, Aleksandar R.
AU  - Đorđević, Dragana S.
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2109
AB  - This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniques and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Chemosphere
T1  - Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods
VL  - 198
SP  - 103
EP  - 110
DO  - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Relić, Dubravka and Héberger, Karoly and Sakan, Sanja M. and Škrbić, Biljana and Popović, Aleksandar R. and Đorđević, Dragana S.",
year = "2018",
abstract = "This study aims to compare three extraction techniques of four sequential element extraction steps from soil and sediment samples that were taken from the location of the Pancevo petrochemical industry (Serbia). Elements were extracted using three different techniques: conventional, microwave and ultrasound extraction. A novel procedure sum of the ranking differences (SRD) - was able to rank the techniques and elements, to see whether this method is a suitable tool to reveal the similarities and dissimilarities in element extraction techniques, provided that a proper ranking reference is available. The concentrations of the following elements Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Sn, Sr, V and Zn were determined through ICP OES. The different efficiencies and recovery values of element concentrations using each of the three extraction techniques were examined by the CRM BCR-701. By using SRD, we obtained a better separation between the different extraction techniques and steps when we rank their differences among the samples while lower separation was obtained according to analysed elements. Appling this method for ordering the elements could be useful for three purposes: (i) to find possible associations among the elements; (ii) to find possible elements that have outlier concentrations or (iii) detect differences in geochemical origin or behaviour of elements. Cross-validation of the SRD values in combination with cluster and principal component analysis revealed the same groups of extraction steps and techniques. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Chemosphere",
title = "Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods",
volume = "198",
pages = "103-110",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200"
}
Relić, D., Héberger, K., Sakan, S. M., Škrbić, B., Popović, A. R.,& Đorđević, D. S.. (2018). Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods. in Chemosphere
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 198, 103-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200
Relić D, Héberger K, Sakan SM, Škrbić B, Popović AR, Đorđević DS. Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods. in Chemosphere. 2018;198:103-110.
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200 .
Relić, Dubravka, Héberger, Karoly, Sakan, Sanja M., Škrbić, Biljana, Popović, Aleksandar R., Đorđević, Dragana S., "Ranking and similarity of conventional, microwave and ultrasound element sequential extraction methods" in Chemosphere, 198 (2018):103-110,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.200 . .
7
3
6
5