Popara, Ana

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
355cebc6-a69d-4cfd-a397-d17a8e5dc6ad
  • Popara, Ana (1)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water

Manojlović, Dragan D.; Popara, Ana; Dojčinović, Biljana P.; Nikolić, Aleksandar S.; Obradović, Bratislav M.; Kuraica, Milorad M.; Puric, Jagos

(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2008)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Manojlović, Dragan D.
AU  - Popara, Ana
AU  - Dojčinović, Biljana P.
AU  - Nikolić, Aleksandar S.
AU  - Obradović, Bratislav M.
AU  - Kuraica, Milorad M.
AU  - Puric, Jagos
PY  - 2008
UR  - https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/976
AB  - Arsenic, well known of its toxicity, is present in potable water in many areas in the world, as well as in underground water used for water supply in Vojvodina, a region in Serbia. Its removal from raw water is necessary before distribution. In this work two methods of arsenic removal from water are compared. First method is water ozonation by introducing ozone in water and then filtration. Second method is treatment of water in plasma reactor and then filtration. High efficiency of the second method was confirmed by low concentration of arsenic in filtrate (below detection limit). (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Vacuum
T1  - Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water
VL  - 83
IS  - 1
SP  - 142
EP  - 145
DO  - 10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Manojlović, Dragan D. and Popara, Ana and Dojčinović, Biljana P. and Nikolić, Aleksandar S. and Obradović, Bratislav M. and Kuraica, Milorad M. and Puric, Jagos",
year = "2008",
abstract = "Arsenic, well known of its toxicity, is present in potable water in many areas in the world, as well as in underground water used for water supply in Vojvodina, a region in Serbia. Its removal from raw water is necessary before distribution. In this work two methods of arsenic removal from water are compared. First method is water ozonation by introducing ozone in water and then filtration. Second method is treatment of water in plasma reactor and then filtration. High efficiency of the second method was confirmed by low concentration of arsenic in filtrate (below detection limit). (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Vacuum",
title = "Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water",
volume = "83",
number = "1",
pages = "142-145",
doi = "10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045"
}
Manojlović, D. D., Popara, A., Dojčinović, B. P., Nikolić, A. S., Obradović, B. M., Kuraica, M. M.,& Puric, J.. (2008). Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water. in Vacuum
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 83(1), 142-145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045
Manojlović DD, Popara A, Dojčinović BP, Nikolić AS, Obradović BM, Kuraica MM, Puric J. Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water. in Vacuum. 2008;83(1):142-145.
doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045 .
Manojlović, Dragan D., Popara, Ana, Dojčinović, Biljana P., Nikolić, Aleksandar S., Obradović, Bratislav M., Kuraica, Milorad M., Puric, Jagos, "Comparison of two methods for removal of arsenic from potable water" in Vacuum, 83, no. 1 (2008):142-145,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.03.045 . .
16
16
20
15