TY  - DATA
AU  - Zengin, Gokhan
AU  - Cvetanović, Aleksandra
AU  - Gašić, Uroš M.
AU  - Tešić, Živoslav Lj.
AU  - Stupar, Alena
AU  - Bulut, Gizem
AU  - Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime
AU  - Uysal, Sengul
AU  - Picot-Allain, Marie Carene Nancy
AU  - Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3965
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Process Biochemistry
T1  - Supplementary data for the article: Zengin, G.; Cvetanović, A.; Gašić, U.; Tešić, Ž.; Stupar, A.; Bulut, G.; Sinan, K. I.; Uysal, S.; Picot-Allain, M. C. N.; Mahomoodally, M. F. A Comparative Exploration of the Phytochemical Profiles and Bio-Pharmaceutical Potential of Helichrysum Stoechas Subsp. Barrelieri Extracts Obtained via Five Extraction Techniques. Process Biochemistry 2020, 91, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3965
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Zengin, Gokhan and Cvetanović, Aleksandra and Gašić, Uroš M. and Tešić, Živoslav Lj. and Stupar, Alena and Bulut, Gizem and Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime and Uysal, Sengul and Picot-Allain, Marie Carene Nancy and Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Process Biochemistry",
title = "Supplementary data for the article: Zengin, G.; Cvetanović, A.; Gašić, U.; Tešić, Ž.; Stupar, A.; Bulut, G.; Sinan, K. I.; Uysal, S.; Picot-Allain, M. C. N.; Mahomoodally, M. F. A Comparative Exploration of the Phytochemical Profiles and Bio-Pharmaceutical Potential of Helichrysum Stoechas Subsp. Barrelieri Extracts Obtained via Five Extraction Techniques. Process Biochemistry 2020, 91, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3965"
}

Zengin, G., Cvetanović, A., Gašić, U. M., Tešić, Ž. Lj., Stupar, A., Bulut, G., Sinan, K. I., Uysal, S., Picot-Allain, M. C. N.,& Mahomoodally, M. F.. (2020). Supplementary data for the article: Zengin, G.; Cvetanović, A.; Gašić, U.; Tešić, Ž.; Stupar, A.; Bulut, G.; Sinan, K. I.; Uysal, S.; Picot-Allain, M. C. N.; Mahomoodally, M. F. A Comparative Exploration of the Phytochemical Profiles and Bio-Pharmaceutical Potential of Helichrysum Stoechas Subsp. Barrelieri Extracts Obtained via Five Extraction Techniques. Process Biochemistry 2020, 91, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002. in Process Biochemistry
Elsevier..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3965

Zengin G, Cvetanović A, Gašić UM, Tešić ŽL, Stupar A, Bulut G, Sinan KI, Uysal S, Picot-Allain MCN, Mahomoodally MF. Supplementary data for the article: Zengin, G.; Cvetanović, A.; Gašić, U.; Tešić, Ž.; Stupar, A.; Bulut, G.; Sinan, K. I.; Uysal, S.; Picot-Allain, M. C. N.; Mahomoodally, M. F. A Comparative Exploration of the Phytochemical Profiles and Bio-Pharmaceutical Potential of Helichrysum Stoechas Subsp. Barrelieri Extracts Obtained via Five Extraction Techniques. Process Biochemistry 2020, 91, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002. in Process Biochemistry. 2020;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3965 .

Zengin, Gokhan, Cvetanović, Aleksandra, Gašić, Uroš M., Tešić, Živoslav Lj., Stupar, Alena, Bulut, Gizem, Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime, Uysal, Sengul, Picot-Allain, Marie Carene Nancy, Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi, "Supplementary data for the article: Zengin, G.; Cvetanović, A.; Gašić, U.; Tešić, Ž.; Stupar, A.; Bulut, G.; Sinan, K. I.; Uysal, S.; Picot-Allain, M. C. N.; Mahomoodally, M. F. A Comparative Exploration of the Phytochemical Profiles and Bio-Pharmaceutical Potential of Helichrysum Stoechas Subsp. Barrelieri Extracts Obtained via Five Extraction Techniques. Process Biochemistry 2020, 91, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002" in Process Biochemistry (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_cherry_3965 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zengin, Gokhan
AU  - Cvetanović, Aleksandra
AU  - Gašić, Uroš M.
AU  - Tešić, Živoslav Lj.
AU  - Stupar, Alena
AU  - Bulut, Gizem
AU  - Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime
AU  - Uysal, Sengul
AU  - Picot-Allain, Marie Carene Nancy
AU  - Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3963
AB  - We endeavoured to probe into and compare the possible effect(s) of different extraction techniques (accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasonication-assisted extraction (UAE), maceration, and Soxhlet extraction (SE)) on the bioactivity (antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities) of the aerial parts of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri (Ten.) Nyman. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of the extracts obtained by different extraction methods followed the order of ASE > MAE > UAE > maceration > SE. Extract obtained by ASE was the most potent radical scavenger (219.92 and 313.12 mg Trolox equivalent [TE]/g, against 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS), respectively) and reducing agent (927.39 and 662.87 mg TE/g, for cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), respectively). Helichrysum stoechas extract obtained by UAE (18.67 mg ethylenediaminetetraacetic equivalent [EDTAE]/g) was the most active metal chelator and inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (4.23 mg galantamine equivalent [GALAE]/g) and butyrylcholinesterase (6.05 mg GALAE/g) cholinesterase. Extract from maceration (183.32 mg kojic acid equivalent [KAE]/g) was most active against tyrosinase while ASE extract (1.66 mmol acarbose equivalent [ACAE]/g) effectively inhibited α-glucosidase. In conclusion, data amassed herein tend to advocate for the use of non-conventional extraction techniques, namely ASE and UAE, for the extraction of bioactive secondary metabolites from H. stoechas aerial parts.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Process Biochemistry
T1  - A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques
VL  - 91
SP  - 113
EP  - 125
DO  - 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Zengin, Gokhan and Cvetanović, Aleksandra and Gašić, Uroš M. and Tešić, Živoslav Lj. and Stupar, Alena and Bulut, Gizem and Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime and Uysal, Sengul and Picot-Allain, Marie Carene Nancy and Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi",
year = "2020",
abstract = "We endeavoured to probe into and compare the possible effect(s) of different extraction techniques (accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasonication-assisted extraction (UAE), maceration, and Soxhlet extraction (SE)) on the bioactivity (antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities) of the aerial parts of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri (Ten.) Nyman. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of the extracts obtained by different extraction methods followed the order of ASE > MAE > UAE > maceration > SE. Extract obtained by ASE was the most potent radical scavenger (219.92 and 313.12 mg Trolox equivalent [TE]/g, against 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS), respectively) and reducing agent (927.39 and 662.87 mg TE/g, for cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), respectively). Helichrysum stoechas extract obtained by UAE (18.67 mg ethylenediaminetetraacetic equivalent [EDTAE]/g) was the most active metal chelator and inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (4.23 mg galantamine equivalent [GALAE]/g) and butyrylcholinesterase (6.05 mg GALAE/g) cholinesterase. Extract from maceration (183.32 mg kojic acid equivalent [KAE]/g) was most active against tyrosinase while ASE extract (1.66 mmol acarbose equivalent [ACAE]/g) effectively inhibited α-glucosidase. In conclusion, data amassed herein tend to advocate for the use of non-conventional extraction techniques, namely ASE and UAE, for the extraction of bioactive secondary metabolites from H. stoechas aerial parts.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Process Biochemistry",
title = "A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques",
volume = "91",
pages = "113-125",
doi = "10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002"
}

Zengin, G., Cvetanović, A., Gašić, U. M., Tešić, Ž. Lj., Stupar, A., Bulut, G., Sinan, K. I., Uysal, S., Picot-Allain, M. C. N.,& Mahomoodally, M. F.. (2020). A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques. in Process Biochemistry
Elsevier., 91, 113-125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002

Zengin G, Cvetanović A, Gašić UM, Tešić ŽL, Stupar A, Bulut G, Sinan KI, Uysal S, Picot-Allain MCN, Mahomoodally MF. A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques. in Process Biochemistry. 2020;91:113-125.
doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002 .

Zengin, Gokhan, Cvetanović, Aleksandra, Gašić, Uroš M., Tešić, Živoslav Lj., Stupar, Alena, Bulut, Gizem, Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime, Uysal, Sengul, Picot-Allain, Marie Carene Nancy, Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi, "A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques" in Process Biochemistry, 91 (2020):113-125,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zengin, Gokhan
AU  - Cvetanović, Aleksandra
AU  - Gašić, Uroš M.
AU  - Tešić, Živoslav Lj.
AU  - Stupar, Alena
AU  - Bulut, Gizem
AU  - Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime
AU  - Uysal, Sengul
AU  - Picot-Allain, Marie Carene Nancy
AU  - Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3964
AB  - We endeavoured to probe into and compare the possible effect(s) of different extraction techniques (accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasonication-assisted extraction (UAE), maceration, and Soxhlet extraction (SE)) on the bioactivity (antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities) of the aerial parts of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri (Ten.) Nyman. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of the extracts obtained by different extraction methods followed the order of ASE > MAE > UAE > maceration > SE. Extract obtained by ASE was the most potent radical scavenger (219.92 and 313.12 mg Trolox equivalent [TE]/g, against 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS), respectively) and reducing agent (927.39 and 662.87 mg TE/g, for cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), respectively). Helichrysum stoechas extract obtained by UAE (18.67 mg ethylenediaminetetraacetic equivalent [EDTAE]/g) was the most active metal chelator and inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (4.23 mg galantamine equivalent [GALAE]/g) and butyrylcholinesterase (6.05 mg GALAE/g) cholinesterase. Extract from maceration (183.32 mg kojic acid equivalent [KAE]/g) was most active against tyrosinase while ASE extract (1.66 mmol acarbose equivalent [ACAE]/g) effectively inhibited α-glucosidase. In conclusion, data amassed herein tend to advocate for the use of non-conventional extraction techniques, namely ASE and UAE, for the extraction of bioactive secondary metabolites from H. stoechas aerial parts.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Process Biochemistry
T1  - A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques
VL  - 91
SP  - 113
EP  - 125
DO  - 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Zengin, Gokhan and Cvetanović, Aleksandra and Gašić, Uroš M. and Tešić, Živoslav Lj. and Stupar, Alena and Bulut, Gizem and Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime and Uysal, Sengul and Picot-Allain, Marie Carene Nancy and Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi",
year = "2020",
abstract = "We endeavoured to probe into and compare the possible effect(s) of different extraction techniques (accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasonication-assisted extraction (UAE), maceration, and Soxhlet extraction (SE)) on the bioactivity (antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities) of the aerial parts of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri (Ten.) Nyman. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of the extracts obtained by different extraction methods followed the order of ASE > MAE > UAE > maceration > SE. Extract obtained by ASE was the most potent radical scavenger (219.92 and 313.12 mg Trolox equivalent [TE]/g, against 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS), respectively) and reducing agent (927.39 and 662.87 mg TE/g, for cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), respectively). Helichrysum stoechas extract obtained by UAE (18.67 mg ethylenediaminetetraacetic equivalent [EDTAE]/g) was the most active metal chelator and inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (4.23 mg galantamine equivalent [GALAE]/g) and butyrylcholinesterase (6.05 mg GALAE/g) cholinesterase. Extract from maceration (183.32 mg kojic acid equivalent [KAE]/g) was most active against tyrosinase while ASE extract (1.66 mmol acarbose equivalent [ACAE]/g) effectively inhibited α-glucosidase. In conclusion, data amassed herein tend to advocate for the use of non-conventional extraction techniques, namely ASE and UAE, for the extraction of bioactive secondary metabolites from H. stoechas aerial parts.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Process Biochemistry",
title = "A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques",
volume = "91",
pages = "113-125",
doi = "10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002"
}

Zengin, G., Cvetanović, A., Gašić, U. M., Tešić, Ž. Lj., Stupar, A., Bulut, G., Sinan, K. I., Uysal, S., Picot-Allain, M. C. N.,& Mahomoodally, M. F.. (2020). A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques. in Process Biochemistry
Elsevier., 91, 113-125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002

Zengin G, Cvetanović A, Gašić UM, Tešić ŽL, Stupar A, Bulut G, Sinan KI, Uysal S, Picot-Allain MCN, Mahomoodally MF. A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques. in Process Biochemistry. 2020;91:113-125.
doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002 .

Zengin, Gokhan, Cvetanović, Aleksandra, Gašić, Uroš M., Tešić, Živoslav Lj., Stupar, Alena, Bulut, Gizem, Sinan, Kouadio Ibrahime, Uysal, Sengul, Picot-Allain, Marie Carene Nancy, Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi, "A comparative exploration of the phytochemical profiles and bio-pharmaceutical potential of Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri extracts obtained via five extraction techniques" in Process Biochemistry, 91 (2020):113-125,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.002 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cvetanović, Aleksandra
AU  - Švarc-Gajić, Jaroslava
AU  - Zeković, Zoran P.
AU  - Gašić, Uroš M.
AU  - Tešić, Živoslav Lj.
AU  - Zengin, Gokhan
AU  - Mašković, Pavle
AU  - Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi
AU  - Đurović, Saša
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2173
AB  - The study was designed to determine the relationship between chemical structure, bioactivity and pressure during the subcritical water extraction (SCW) of chamomile. Extraction was carried out at isothermal conditions (100 degrees C) at five different pressures (10, 30, 45, 60 and 90 bar). Twenty three polyphenolic compounds were identified in the extracts, whereby apigenin was found to be the dominant compound (61.53-1344.99 mg/kg). Results suggest that the lowest applied pressure has negligible effect on phenolic recovery from chamomile, but also the use of pressures above than 45 bar was proven as needlessly. By using in vitro assays, influence of pressure on antioxidant, cytotoxic and enzyme-inhibitory activities of the extracts was evaluated. Extracts obtained at 30, 45 and 60 bar exhibited stronger bioactivities than at 10 and 90 bar. It was concluded that pressure exert a significant influence on chemical composition of extracts, and thus on biological activity of chamomile extracts.
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Food Chemistry
T1  - Subcritical water extraction as a cutting edge technology for the extraction of bioactive compounds from chamomile: Influence of pressure on chemical composition and bioactivity of extracts
VL  - 266
SP  - 389
EP  - 396
DO  - 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.037
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Cvetanović, Aleksandra and Švarc-Gajić, Jaroslava and Zeković, Zoran P. and Gašić, Uroš M. and Tešić, Živoslav Lj. and Zengin, Gokhan and Mašković, Pavle and Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi and Đurović, Saša",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The study was designed to determine the relationship between chemical structure, bioactivity and pressure during the subcritical water extraction (SCW) of chamomile. Extraction was carried out at isothermal conditions (100 degrees C) at five different pressures (10, 30, 45, 60 and 90 bar). Twenty three polyphenolic compounds were identified in the extracts, whereby apigenin was found to be the dominant compound (61.53-1344.99 mg/kg). Results suggest that the lowest applied pressure has negligible effect on phenolic recovery from chamomile, but also the use of pressures above than 45 bar was proven as needlessly. By using in vitro assays, influence of pressure on antioxidant, cytotoxic and enzyme-inhibitory activities of the extracts was evaluated. Extracts obtained at 30, 45 and 60 bar exhibited stronger bioactivities than at 10 and 90 bar. It was concluded that pressure exert a significant influence on chemical composition of extracts, and thus on biological activity of chamomile extracts.",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Food Chemistry",
title = "Subcritical water extraction as a cutting edge technology for the extraction of bioactive compounds from chamomile: Influence of pressure on chemical composition and bioactivity of extracts",
volume = "266",
pages = "389-396",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.037"
}

Cvetanović, A., Švarc-Gajić, J., Zeković, Z. P., Gašić, U. M., Tešić, Ž. Lj., Zengin, G., Mašković, P., Mahomoodally, M. F.,& Đurović, S.. (2018). Subcritical water extraction as a cutting edge technology for the extraction of bioactive compounds from chamomile: Influence of pressure on chemical composition and bioactivity of extracts. in Food Chemistry
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 266, 389-396.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.037

Cvetanović A, Švarc-Gajić J, Zeković ZP, Gašić UM, Tešić ŽL, Zengin G, Mašković P, Mahomoodally MF, Đurović S. Subcritical water extraction as a cutting edge technology for the extraction of bioactive compounds from chamomile: Influence of pressure on chemical composition and bioactivity of extracts. in Food Chemistry. 2018;266:389-396.
doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.037 .

Cvetanović, Aleksandra, Švarc-Gajić, Jaroslava, Zeković, Zoran P., Gašić, Uroš M., Tešić, Živoslav Lj., Zengin, Gokhan, Mašković, Pavle, Mahomoodally, Mohamad Fawzi, Đurović, Saša, "Subcritical water extraction as a cutting edge technology for the extraction of bioactive compounds from chamomile: Influence of pressure on chemical composition and bioactivity of extracts" in Food Chemistry, 266 (2018):389-396,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.037 . .