Llupa, Jonilda

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
f52917f9-b45b-45ad-9665-d740ed3ce1c5
  • Llupa, Jonilda (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

LC-MS/MS characterization of phenolic compounds in the quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit juices

Llupa, Jonilda; Gašić, Uroš M.; Brčeski, Ilija; Demertizis, Panagiotis; Tešević, Vele; Topi, Dritan

(Univerzitet Crne Gore, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Llupa, Jonilda
AU  - Gašić, Uroš M.
AU  - Brčeski, Ilija
AU  - Demertizis, Panagiotis
AU  - Tešević, Vele
AU  - Topi, Dritan
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5508
AB  - Quince and sweet cherry are two common edible fruit-producing trees of temperate regions of Euroasia. The phenolic profiles of juices from quince and sweet cherry fruit extracted by the cold-pressing were analyzed by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC). Chromatographical results identified 31 phenolic compounds while quantified thirteen for fruit juices. The quantitative data indicate that the predominant phenolic was 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid in quince (8.343 mg L-1) and cherry juice (6.407 mg L-1). Total Flavonoids (TF), Total Phenolic Content (TPC), and Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) were also investigated. In both fruit juices, the TF values varied between 0.30-0.97 g L-1 (Catechin Equivalent) and TPC between 0.36 to 0.94 g L-1 (Gallic Acid Equivalent). It is worth noting that the quince fruit juices possessed a higher TPC and TFC compared to sweet cherry fruit juices.
PB  - Univerzitet Crne Gore
T2  - Agriculture and Forestry
T1  - LC-MS/MS characterization of phenolic compounds in the quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit juices
VL  - 68
SP  - 193
EP  - 205
DO  - 10.17707/AgricultForest.68.2.14
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Llupa, Jonilda and Gašić, Uroš M. and Brčeski, Ilija and Demertizis, Panagiotis and Tešević, Vele and Topi, Dritan",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Quince and sweet cherry are two common edible fruit-producing trees of temperate regions of Euroasia. The phenolic profiles of juices from quince and sweet cherry fruit extracted by the cold-pressing were analyzed by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC). Chromatographical results identified 31 phenolic compounds while quantified thirteen for fruit juices. The quantitative data indicate that the predominant phenolic was 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid in quince (8.343 mg L-1) and cherry juice (6.407 mg L-1). Total Flavonoids (TF), Total Phenolic Content (TPC), and Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) were also investigated. In both fruit juices, the TF values varied between 0.30-0.97 g L-1 (Catechin Equivalent) and TPC between 0.36 to 0.94 g L-1 (Gallic Acid Equivalent). It is worth noting that the quince fruit juices possessed a higher TPC and TFC compared to sweet cherry fruit juices.",
publisher = "Univerzitet Crne Gore",
journal = "Agriculture and Forestry",
title = "LC-MS/MS characterization of phenolic compounds in the quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit juices",
volume = "68",
pages = "193-205",
doi = "10.17707/AgricultForest.68.2.14"
}
Llupa, J., Gašić, U. M., Brčeski, I., Demertizis, P., Tešević, V.,& Topi, D.. (2022). LC-MS/MS characterization of phenolic compounds in the quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit juices. in Agriculture and Forestry
Univerzitet Crne Gore., 68, 193-205.
https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.68.2.14
Llupa J, Gašić UM, Brčeski I, Demertizis P, Tešević V, Topi D. LC-MS/MS characterization of phenolic compounds in the quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit juices. in Agriculture and Forestry. 2022;68:193-205.
doi:10.17707/AgricultForest.68.2.14 .
Llupa, Jonilda, Gašić, Uroš M., Brčeski, Ilija, Demertizis, Panagiotis, Tešević, Vele, Topi, Dritan, "LC-MS/MS characterization of phenolic compounds in the quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit juices" in Agriculture and Forestry, 68 (2022):193-205,
https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.68.2.14 . .
2
5
2