What is the preferred geometry of sulfur–disulfide interactions?
Нема приказа
Аутори
Veljković, Ivana S.Veljković, Dušan Ž.
Sarić, Gordana G.
Stanković, Ivana M.
Zarić, Snežana D.
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
,
The Royal Society of Chemistry
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Non-covalent interactions between disulfide fragments and sulfur atoms were studied in crystal structures of small molecules and by quantum chemical calculations. Statistical analysis of the geometrical data from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) reveals that in most cases, interactions between sulfur and disulfide bonds are bifurcated. Quantum chemical calculations are in agreement with those findings. A strong interaction energy was calculated for bifurcated interactions (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −2.83 kcal mol−1) considering the region along the disulfide bond. Non-bifurcated interactions are weaker except in cases where σ-hole interaction is possible or in cases where S⋯S interaction is accompanied by additional hydrogen bonds (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −3.26 kcal mol−1). SAPT decomposition analysis shows that dispersion is the main attractive force in the studied systems while electrostatics plays a crucial role in defining the geometry of interactions.Non-covalent interactions between disulfide... fragments and sulfur atoms were studied in crystal structures of small molecules and by quantum chemical calculations. Statistical analysis of the geometrical data from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) reveals that in most cases, interactions between sulfur and disulfide bonds are bifurcated. Quantum chemical calculations are in agreement with those findings. A strong interaction energy was calculated for bifurcated interactions (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −2.83 kcal mol−1) considering the region along the disulfide bond. Non-bifurcated interactions are weaker except in cases where σ-hole interaction is possible or in cases where S⋯S interaction is accompanied by additional hydrogen bonds (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −3.26 kcal mol−1). SAPT decomposition analysis shows that dispersion is the main attractive force in the studied systems while electrostatics plays a crucial role in defining the geometry of interactions.
Кључне речи:
Non-covalent interactions / disulfide / Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) / Sulfur compounds / CCSD(T) / Statistical analysis / Quantum chemical calculationsИзвор:
CrystEngComm, 2020, 22, 7262-7271Издавач:
- Royal Society of Chemistry
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Нековалентне интеракције pi-система и њихова улога у молекулском препознавању (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-172065)
- Qatar Foundation for Education, Science and Community Development
Напомена:
- The peer-reviewed version: https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4287
DOI: 10.1039/D0CE00211A
ISSN: 1466-8033
WoS: 000589506600010
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85096032646
Колекције
Институција/група
Hemijski fakultet / Faculty of ChemistryTY - JOUR AU - Veljković, Ivana S. AU - Veljković, Dušan Ž. AU - Sarić, Gordana G. AU - Stanković, Ivana M. AU - Zarić, Snežana D. PY - 2020 UR - https://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4286 AB - Non-covalent interactions between disulfide fragments and sulfur atoms were studied in crystal structures of small molecules and by quantum chemical calculations. Statistical analysis of the geometrical data from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) reveals that in most cases, interactions between sulfur and disulfide bonds are bifurcated. Quantum chemical calculations are in agreement with those findings. A strong interaction energy was calculated for bifurcated interactions (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −2.83 kcal mol−1) considering the region along the disulfide bond. Non-bifurcated interactions are weaker except in cases where σ-hole interaction is possible or in cases where S⋯S interaction is accompanied by additional hydrogen bonds (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −3.26 kcal mol−1). SAPT decomposition analysis shows that dispersion is the main attractive force in the studied systems while electrostatics plays a crucial role in defining the geometry of interactions.Non-covalent interactions between disulfide fragments and sulfur atoms were studied in crystal structures of small molecules and by quantum chemical calculations. Statistical analysis of the geometrical data from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) reveals that in most cases, interactions between sulfur and disulfide bonds are bifurcated. Quantum chemical calculations are in agreement with those findings. A strong interaction energy was calculated for bifurcated interactions (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −2.83 kcal mol−1) considering the region along the disulfide bond. Non-bifurcated interactions are weaker except in cases where σ-hole interaction is possible or in cases where S⋯S interaction is accompanied by additional hydrogen bonds (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −3.26 kcal mol−1). SAPT decomposition analysis shows that dispersion is the main attractive force in the studied systems while electrostatics plays a crucial role in defining the geometry of interactions. PB - Royal Society of Chemistry T2 - CrystEngComm T1 - What is the preferred geometry of sulfur–disulfide interactions? VL - 22 SP - 7262 EP - 7271 DO - 10.1039/D0CE00211A ER -
@article{ author = "Veljković, Ivana S. and Veljković, Dušan Ž. and Sarić, Gordana G. and Stanković, Ivana M. and Zarić, Snežana D.", year = "2020", abstract = "Non-covalent interactions between disulfide fragments and sulfur atoms were studied in crystal structures of small molecules and by quantum chemical calculations. Statistical analysis of the geometrical data from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) reveals that in most cases, interactions between sulfur and disulfide bonds are bifurcated. Quantum chemical calculations are in agreement with those findings. A strong interaction energy was calculated for bifurcated interactions (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −2.83 kcal mol−1) considering the region along the disulfide bond. Non-bifurcated interactions are weaker except in cases where σ-hole interaction is possible or in cases where S⋯S interaction is accompanied by additional hydrogen bonds (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −3.26 kcal mol−1). SAPT decomposition analysis shows that dispersion is the main attractive force in the studied systems while electrostatics plays a crucial role in defining the geometry of interactions.Non-covalent interactions between disulfide fragments and sulfur atoms were studied in crystal structures of small molecules and by quantum chemical calculations. Statistical analysis of the geometrical data from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) reveals that in most cases, interactions between sulfur and disulfide bonds are bifurcated. Quantum chemical calculations are in agreement with those findings. A strong interaction energy was calculated for bifurcated interactions (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −2.83 kcal mol−1) considering the region along the disulfide bond. Non-bifurcated interactions are weaker except in cases where σ-hole interaction is possible or in cases where S⋯S interaction is accompanied by additional hydrogen bonds (ECCSD(T)/CBS = −3.26 kcal mol−1). SAPT decomposition analysis shows that dispersion is the main attractive force in the studied systems while electrostatics plays a crucial role in defining the geometry of interactions.", publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry", journal = "CrystEngComm", title = "What is the preferred geometry of sulfur–disulfide interactions?", volume = "22", pages = "7262-7271", doi = "10.1039/D0CE00211A" }
Veljković, I. S., Veljković, D. Ž., Sarić, G. G., Stanković, I. M.,& Zarić, S. D.. (2020). What is the preferred geometry of sulfur–disulfide interactions?. in CrystEngComm Royal Society of Chemistry., 22, 7262-7271. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CE00211A
Veljković IS, Veljković DŽ, Sarić GG, Stanković IM, Zarić SD. What is the preferred geometry of sulfur–disulfide interactions?. in CrystEngComm. 2020;22:7262-7271. doi:10.1039/D0CE00211A .
Veljković, Ivana S., Veljković, Dušan Ž., Sarić, Gordana G., Stanković, Ivana M., Zarić, Snežana D., "What is the preferred geometry of sulfur–disulfide interactions?" in CrystEngComm, 22 (2020):7262-7271, https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CE00211A . .